Bug 9300
| Summary: | Bad options for pcmcia Configure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Michael Tokarev <mjt> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Michael K. Johnson <johnsonm> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 1.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2000-02-10 14:20:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Cured for new pcmcia. |
When building kernel package. Rpm .spec file for kernel says (BuildPCMCIA): make -C pcmcia-cs-%{pcmciaver} config <<EOF $RPM_BUILD_DIR/linux $RPM_BUILD_ROOT /lib/modules/%{KVERREL}$1 $RPM_OPT_FLAGS gcc y y y 2 y /etc/rc.d EOF But: pcmcia config script expects answers to this questions (note entry marked with asterisk): Linux source directory (ok) Alternate target install directory (ok) Module install directory (ok) *Build 'trusting' versions of card utilities (y/n) -- got $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, gcc, and y finally Include 32-bit (CardBus) card support (y/n) (ok) Include PnP BIOS resource checking (y/n) kernel-specific options (1-2) (ok) System V init script layout (y/n) (ok) Top-level directory for RC scripts (ok) Configure script that is called by "make config" have options for all of this stuff and other. My suggestion is to put direct call to Configure from .spec rather than this options in "correct" order. (this is for version 2.2.14-1.3.0 and some earlier)