Bug 94
| Summary: | script 'rc' glob is too general | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | saint |
| Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | rvokal, saint |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-05-04 14:52:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
changed priority, but he does have a point. Seems reasonable. The current implementation (using K* rather than K[0-9][0-9]*) is identical to that implemented in SVR4 from which the entire convention has been borrowed. Adding a more restrictive glob solves no purpose that I can fathom (other than the obvious non-problem). mote-0.6.1-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-47926d2699 mote-0.6.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-47926d2699 mote-0.6.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
If the convention is Snn and Knn as a prefix to script names in the various run level folders, then shouldn't the glob be more specific in the script /etc/rc.d/rc? It could be: for i in /etc/rc.d/rc$runlevel.d/K[0-9][0-9]*; do ... done and for i in /etc/rc.d/rc$runlevel.d/S[0-9][0-9]*; do ... done It is: for i in /etc/rc.d/rc$runlevel.d/K*; do ... done and for i in /etc/rc.d/rc$runlevel.d/S*; do ... done