Bug 9452
Summary: | Incorrectly decides there's insufficient disk space for installation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Ken Martin <fletcher> |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Erik Troan <ewt> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-02-23 20:15:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ken Martin
2000-02-15 02:33:10 UTC
I presume you meant "signed int" when you said "unsigned int" ??? Yes, I meant 'signed'. Sorry 'bout that. I'll start looking into the source code for this more deeply tomorrow (2/16/00) evening when I get the chance. Hopefully python won't confuse me as much as I've already confused myself. :) There is a pretty good chance this is what is happening. We found a similiar bug in the RAID code which resulted in much of the same behavior. I will also be playing around in the lab with this setup, so hopefully one of the two of us will be able to shed light on this matter. Attempted to reproduce with specified partition table and it works in latest beta of installer. So, which "latest beta of installer" did you try, and where can I get it to try it out and ensure that this bug's been fixed? I did spend about 3 hours looking through the Anaconda source, and got thoroughly lost. |