Bug 951862

Summary:

[abrt] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]

Product:

[Fedora] Fedora

Reporter:

Flóki Pálsson <flokip>

Component:

kernel

Assignee:

Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>

Status:

CLOSED WONTFIX

QA Contact:

Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>

Severity:

unspecified

Docs Contact:

Priority:

unspecified

Version:

CC:

caf, gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, madhu.chinakonda, mikhail.v.gavrilov, nicolas.mailhot, nireus, samuel-rhbugs

Target Milestone:

---

Target Release:

---

Hardware:

x86_64

OS:

Unspecified

Whiteboard:

abrt_hash:ae239ea9328fc81bf4ce85b0e6ca7976dd4b513a

Fixed In Version:

Doc Type:

Bug Fix

Doc Text:

Story Points:

---

Clone Of:

Environment:

Last Closed:

2015-03-25 12:27:02 UTC

Type:

---

Regression:

---

Mount Type:

---

Documentation:

---

CRM:

Verified Versions:

Category:

---

oVirt Team:

---

RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Cloudforms Team:

---

Target Upstream Version:

Embargoed:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
File: dmesg	none

Description Flóki Pálsson 2013-04-13 22:53:32 UTC

Description of problem:
booting xx

Additional info:
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.9.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc19.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
pulseaudio/2258 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa03535b3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
but task is already holding lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa03535b3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
 *** DEADLOCK ***
 May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by pulseaudio/2258:
 #0:  (snd_pcm_link_rwlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa03550f7>] snd_pcm_drop+0x57/0xf0 [snd_pcm]
 #1:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa03550ff>] snd_pcm_drop+0x5f/0xf0 [snd_pcm]
 #2:  (&(&substream->group->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa0354f21>] snd_pcm_action+0x31/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 #3:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa03535b3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 2258, comm: pulseaudio Not tainted 3.9.0-0.rc6.git2.1.fc19.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810da2f6>] __lock_acquire+0x1756/0x1a60
 [<ffffffff810acd68>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x100
 [<ffffffff810d8e85>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2e5/0x1a60
 [<ffffffff810dadb2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x1f0
 [<ffffffffa03535b3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff817191b4>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x44/0x80
 [<ffffffffa03535b3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa03535b3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0354f54>] snd_pcm_action+0x64/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0355120>] snd_pcm_drop+0x80/0xf0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0356f68>] snd_pcm_common_ioctl1+0x8d8/0xc00 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff812f09ed>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x16d/0x350
 [<ffffffff812f08a9>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x29/0x350
 [<ffffffffa0357423>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+0x193/0x2c0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0357580>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x30/0x40 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff811edd65>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
 [<ffffffff812f337b>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x5b/0x110
 [<ffffffff811ee011>] sys_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81723019>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Comment 1 Flóki Pálsson 2013-04-13 22:53:36 UTC

Created attachment 735476 [details]
File: dmesg

Comment 2 Josh Boyer 2013-05-16 13:59:10 UTC

*** Bug 958937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Nicolas Mailhot 2013-08-17 20:38:47 UTC

Description of problem:
on boot   

Version-Release number of selected component:
kernel

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.6
cmdline:        BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.11.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc20.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-fedora ro rd.md.uuid=60ab7ad8:5e71ed16:57627bc9:17e70637 rd.md.uuid=746f1cca:4ea1a3c9:22961411:6ca914c8 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 rd.lvm.lv=VolGroup00/fedora KEYTABLE=fr-oss rd.luks=0 rd.dm=0 rd.systemd.log_level=debug systemd.log_level=debug rd.info log_buf_len=1M
kernel:         3.11.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc20.x86_64
runlevel:       unknown
type:           Kerneloops

Truncated backtrace:
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.11.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc20.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
pulseaudio/980 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01514f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
but task is already holding lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01514f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
 *** DEADLOCK ***
 May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by pulseaudio/980:
 #0:  (snd_pcm_link_rwlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01531c7>] snd_pcm_drop+0x57/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 #1:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01531cf>] snd_pcm_drop+0x5f/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 #2:  (&(&substream->group->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa0152ff1>] snd_pcm_action+0x31/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 #3:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01514f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 980 Comm: pulseaudio Not tainted 3.11.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc20.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. EP45-DS5/EP45-DS5, BIOS F12 09/30/2008
 ffff8800ae9a8000 ffff8800b2781be0 ffffffff8172e175 ffffffff825f96b0
 ffff8800b2781ca0 ffffffff810e881f 0000000000005d30 000000010000000c
 0000000100000000 0002491200000000 492249927893e49f ffffffff82216800
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8172e175>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
 [<ffffffff810e881f>] __lock_acquire+0x1a0f/0x1b20
 [<ffffffff810e70f5>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2e5/0x1b20
 [<ffffffff810e9122>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x1f0
 [<ffffffffa01514f3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff81736c54>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x44/0x80
 [<ffffffffa01514f3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01514f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0153024>] snd_pcm_action+0x64/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01531f0>] snd_pcm_drop+0x80/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0154dc0>] snd_pcm_common_ioctl1+0x900/0xbf0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff813023cd>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x16d/0x350
 [<ffffffff81302289>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x29/0x350
 [<ffffffffa0155243>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+0x193/0x2a0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa0155380>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x30/0x40 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff81203fe5>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
 [<ffffffff81304d0b>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x5b/0x110
 [<ffffffff81204291>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81741059>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Comment 4 Josh Boyer 2013-09-18 20:52:37 UTC

*********** MASS BUG UPDATE **************

We apologize for the inconvenience.  There is a large number of bugs to go through and several of them have gone stale.  Due to this, we are doing a mass bug update across all of the Fedora 19 kernel bugs.

Fedora 19 has now been rebased to 3.11.1-200.fc19.  Please test this kernel update and let us know if you issue has been resolved or if it is still present with the newer kernel.

If you experience different issues, please open a new bug report for those.

Comment 5 Nicolas Mailhot 2013-09-19 19:58:52 UTC

[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.12.0-0.rc1.git3.1.fc21.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
pulseaudio/1297 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
but task is already holding lock:
 (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
  lock(&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1);
 *** DEADLOCK ***
 May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by pulseaudio/1297:
 #0:  (snd_pcm_link_rwlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d71c7>] snd_pcm_drop+0x57/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 #1:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d71cf>] snd_pcm_drop+0x5f/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 #2:  (&(&substream->group->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d6ff1>] snd_pcm_action+0x31/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 #3:  (&(&substream->self_group.lock)->rlock/1){......}, at: [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1297 Comm: pulseaudio Not tainted 3.12.0-0.rc1.git3.1.fc21.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. EP45-DS5/EP45-DS5, BIOS F12 09/30/2008
 ffff880117f72e60 ffff880076a35be0 ffffffff817416a3 ffffffff82615f10
 ffff880076a35ca0 ffffffff810f0b57 0000000000004ef0 000000010000000c
 0000000100000000 00028c9400000000 51928d1490a4a525 ffffffff8222fc00
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff817416a3>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
 [<ffffffff810f0b57>] __lock_acquire+0x1a97/0x1aa0
 [<ffffffff810ef3a5>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2e5/0x1aa0
 [<ffffffff810f1352>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x1f0
 [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff8174a2d4>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x44/0x80
 [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] ? snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01d54f3>] snd_pcm_action_group+0xa3/0x240 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01d7024>] snd_pcm_action+0x64/0xa0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01d71f0>] snd_pcm_drop+0x80/0xe0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01d8dc0>] snd_pcm_common_ioctl1+0x900/0xbf0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff8130bfdd>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x16d/0x350
 [<ffffffff8130be99>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0x29/0x350
 [<ffffffffa01d9243>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+0x193/0x2a0 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffffa01d9380>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl+0x30/0x40 [snd_pcm]
 [<ffffffff8120a435>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x305/0x530
 [<ffffffff8130e92b>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x5b/0x110
 [<ffffffff8120a6e1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81754569>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Comment 6 Josh Boyer 2014-11-17 13:29:49 UTC

*** Bug 1164493 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 14:54:51 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22