Bug 953171

Summary: ER: Need for operations only on subset of grouped resources
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Stian Lund <stianlund+bugzilla>
Component: Core UI, UsabilityAssignee: Nobody <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecifiedCC: hrupp, jpviragine
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
RHQ Mockup none

Description Stian Lund 2013-04-17 13:53:18 UTC
Created attachment 736869 [details]
RHQ Mockup

Description of problem:
Enhancement Request
==================

There is a need for the possibility to do an operation on a subset of grouped resources through the RHQ UI.

For instance, say you have 8 Tomcat servers in a group, but only want to restart four of them at a time. 

Either you have to do operations on each server individually - which is a lot of clicks - or have to find some workaround like removing servers from the list after the operations have started.

The way this could possibly be implemented would be to have a separate listbox to the right of the "Member Resource" list where you could move servers/resources you do not want to include in the operation. See attachment rhq-mockup for an example.

Unfortunately my competence for coding this would be sub-par so hopefully with someone could have a look at implementing this.

Logged as ER after posting on RHQ community forums:
https://community.jboss.org/thread/223808


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
n/a

How reproducible:
n/a

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 John Mazzitelli 2013-06-27 15:47:51 UTC
*** Bug 535393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***