Bug 953530
| Summary: | Cloudinit has a requirement on rsyslog | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | robert.vanleeuwen |
| Component: | cloud-init | Assignee: | Garrett Holmstrom <gholms> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | apevec, frankieonuonga, gholms, Jan.van.Eldik, mattdm, p, shardy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-04-22 14:07:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
robert.vanleeuwen
2013-04-18 11:38:14 UTC
Note that while the cloud-init package requires the rsyslog package for its /etc/rsyslog.d directory, per the packaging guidelines, it does not require rsyslog to actually be running. Although I'm not sure that we're ready to go to an all systemd-journal approach, some people might want to, and if they want to do that, they might want to not have rsyslog on their cloud images. Or, as above, use syslog-ng. Honestly I personally find a separate /var/log/cloud-init.log to be annoying, so I may not be speaking from the most unbiased place here. :) I'm going to move this to Fedora, because I think we'll make the more "aggressive" changes there first, and it will trickle back to EPEL. One suggestion would be to make a cloud-init-rsyslog subpackage. Let me try look into this and advice . Thanks. I have tried to tinker around with this on my spare time. My opinion is we should probably try and keep it, but then also allow the admin to keep another copy where they please. That way we do not break it. What do you guys think? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 986511 *** |