Bug 956120
Summary: | Review Request: zocial-fonts - Css Social Buttons Fonts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alec Leamas <leamas.alec> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dave, notting, package-review, paul |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-05-06 17:54:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alec Leamas
2013-04-24 10:21:22 UTC
Your changelog version in the spec file does not match the software version zocial-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mixin -> mixing, mix in, mix-in zocial-fonts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20121031-1 ['0.3-1.fc18', '0.3-1'] zocial-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. try %changelog * Mon Apr 23 2013 Alec Leamas <leamas> - 0.3.1 - Initial release Or ... 0.3-1 :) But thanks, something went wrong while copy-pasting three packages. 1. As Zocial fonts started as a separate project, are we sure that the MIT licence covers them? I'm just slightly concerned that the font metadata includes the statement: "Copyright 2011 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved." 2. The summary: "A css3 Social Buttons Sass Framework" doesn't describe the font. 1(In reply to comment #3) > 1. As Zocial fonts started as a separate project, are we sure that the MIT > licence covers them? I'm just slightly concerned that the font metadata > includes the statement: "Copyright 2011 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All > rights reserved." I'm on thin ice here, have no more information than what's in the upstream url (https://github.com/adamstac/zocial). That said, a plain copyright from Adobe shouldn't really change anything, should it? Also, it's obvious that these fonts are handled as "free" on the web, they are sort of wide-spread. Basically, this boils down to that the license markup is wrong since it doesn't mention Adobe, I guess. Please enlighten a font newbie: how do I display font metadata? > 2. The summary: "A css3 Social Buttons Sass Framework" doesn't describe the > font. You are right, will fix (same links) Finally some progress First, zocial is not present in http://www.adobe.com/products/type/font-licensing.html. This site seem to cover all fonts which have some kind of restricted use. There is no other match when looking in the Adobe site for zocial. I think I have found the ultimate upstream https://github.com/samcollins/css-social-buttons. I have evidence on the web that Adobe has been using this font, but Sam Collins seems to be the original author. Links updated in-place (but with a changelog this time). Filing a question to upstream why the Adobe copyright is in the metadata: https://github.com/samcollins/css-social-buttons/issues/55. That said, I don't see this as a problem right now. New links: spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/zocial/css-social-buttons-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/zocial/css-social-buttons-fonts-0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm New links: spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/zocial/css-social-buttons-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/zocial/css-social-buttons-fonts-0.3-1.fc18.src.rpm Blocked by fedora-legal: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2013-May/002165.html. Closing. |