Bug 956782
| Summary: | An IDP "hosted" page using a CSS file will result in java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called for this response | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Tom Fonteyne <tfonteyn> |
| Component: | PicketLink | Assignee: | Pedro Igor <psilva> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Josef Cacek <jcacek> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | asaldhan, bmaxwell, jcacek, myarboro |
| Target Milestone: | ER6 | ||
| Target Release: | EAP 6.1.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-16 20:20:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Tom Fonteyne
2013-04-25 15:42:53 UTC
Is Engineering supposed to provide a patch? Why assignment to Pedro? @Anil >Is Engineering supposed to provide a patch? no - this is the BZ I'm required to open according to procedure. We are required to open: - JIRA for upstream - BZ to indicate same bug, to be fixed in next EAP release - BZ to get new version of component to be included in next EAP (I presume you or Pedro did this as Pedro confirmed in email it would go into 6.2) Optional, and not done (yet) as I still need to check if customer needs it back ported: - BZ for one-off, if needed, to be build by SEG (me) See here for full details: https://docspace.corp.redhat.com/docs/DOC-133944 If you can simplify this specifically for security issues, please do. Verified in EAP 6.1.1.ER6 (PL 2.1.6.3). |