Bug 957348

This package built on koji:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5307871

Some notes about the python-pydns dependency:

* Might want to become comaintainer there.  it looks like pwouters may only be maintainer because of a dep on it from python-pypf.  It's currently at 2.3.3 and 2.3.6 has been released upstream (in 2012).
* AFAIK there isn't a python3-pydns package in Fedora.  Looking at upstream, I suspect that python3-py3dns is going to need to be packaged for that.  Details can be read in the notes at the bottom of the sourceforge download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pydns/files/py3dns/

Taking for review.

There's just two rpmlint warnings that should be easy to fix:

python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/README.txt
python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/Changelog.txt

Everything else looks good and I will approve when those are fixed.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-pylibravatar-1.5-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/README.txt
python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/Changelog.txt
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint python-pylibravatar
python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/README.txt
python-pylibravatar.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-pylibravatar-1.5/Changelog.txt
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
python-pylibravatar (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-pydns



Provides
--------
python-pylibravatar:
    python-pylibravatar



Source checksums
----------------
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pyLibravatar/pyLibravatar-1.5.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : e3566e00e0513394c06bfd04b35aadd84522332196554c39b1e4669908fdd3ac
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e3566e00e0513394c06bfd04b35aadd84522332196554c39b1e4669908fdd3ac


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 957348

(I'm ignoring the python3 side of things for now because of both what Toshio said and the fact that PyLibravatar doesn't support python3 yet anyway).

New release.  I used sed to address the end of line encoding issue found by rpmlint as suggested here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding

Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-pylibravatar.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc18.src.rpm

Cool, cool. Looks good.

APPROVED.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-pylibravatar
Short Description: Python module for Libravatar
Owners: ralph
Branches: f19 f18 el6
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc19

python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc18

Just discovered that python-pydns is not branched for el6.

Marked 980281 as blocking.

python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

python-pylibravatar-1.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

python-pylibravatar-1.5-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pylibravatar-1.5-3.el6

python-pylibravatar-1.5-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-pylibravatar
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

Git done (by process-git-requests).