Bug 960664
| Summary: | Review Request: chicken - A practical and portable Scheme system | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rick Elrod <relrod> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Torrie Fischer <tdfischer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugs.michael, notting, package-review, tdfischer |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | tdfischer:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | chicken-4.8.0.3-4.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-05-26 02:55:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Rick Elrod
2013-05-07 15:35:16 UTC
Taking for a review Overall, looks to be an exemplary piece of packaging work. Well done.
My only question:
Provides: chicken-scheme-doc = %{version}-%{release}
Whats the point of that, if it already provides a chicken-doc package? Alternatively, why not rename the whole package to chicken-scheme instead of just chicken.
I will nuke the Provides in favor of keeping the package named "chicken" - it's called chicken in most distros: http://wiki.call-cc.org/platforms Thanks. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: chicken Short Description: A practical and portable Scheme system Owners: codeblock Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). chicken-4.8.0.3-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chicken-4.8.0.3-3.el6 chicken-4.8.0.3-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chicken-4.8.0.3-3.fc18 chicken-4.8.0.3-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. chicken-4.8.0.3-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chicken-4.8.0.3-4.fc18 chicken-4.8.0.3-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chicken-4.8.0.3-4.el6 chicken-4.8.0.3-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. chicken-4.8.0.3-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. With regard to bug 1001262 (duplicate docs due to F20UnversionedDocDirs change), the following questions have turned up: * Why has a separate -doc subpackage been created for the documentation? It is only 300KB small. It would be really okay to include it in the base package. That would also be a very easy way to fix bug 1001262. * Why is the -doc subpackage not "noarch"? * For the base package, a split between runtime and build-time/development would have made sense. Compiled programs will be linked with libchicken, which could reside in a -libs runtime subpackage. |