Bug 960728
| Summary: | Review Request: kfs - Kosmos distributed file system (KFS) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pete MacKinnon <pmackinn> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | matt, notting, package-review, puntogil, robinlee.sysu, rrati, tstclair |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-05-22 19:26:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Pete MacKinnon
2013-05-07 19:16:49 UTC
KFS upstream seems dead. Do you really want to maintain this package? Or switch to QFS, what you have mentioned in the specfile? As a dependency for the Hadoop 2.x series, we would like to maintain KFS for a period of time and guide Hadoop upstream adoption towards QFS. QFS can be configured in as a pluggable and optimized replacement for KFS so we could develop and package that in parallel (spec and review TBD). Looking at 2.0.5, it appears to be a testing only dependency (possibly for compatibility). It appears we may be able to prune the dependency entirely as we track forward progress a bit closer. Update has been made to branch-2 stream to remove. ref: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8886 I also verified it is no longer required for build and is removed. recommend CLOSE->WONTFIX IMHO, we should still pursue QFS support in the future as time permits. |