Bug 961078
Summary: | Review Request: rasdaemon - Daemon to collect RAS error tracing events from the Kernel drivers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ahecox, arozansk, dougsland, lwang, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-05-21 01:28:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-05-08 18:23:44 UTC
$ rpmlint rasdaemon.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Mauro, that url for the spec is a HTML file and fedora-review can't handle it. I think you'll have to close this one and open a new one. It follows the "rpmlint" output for *.rpm *.src.rpm *.spec: $ rpmlint misc/rasdaemon.spec `rpm --eval %{_topdir}`/SRPMS/rasdaemon-0.3.0*.src.rpm `rpm --eval %{_topdir}`/RPMS/*/rasdaemon-0.3.0*.rpm rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chipsets -> chip sets, chip-sets, Chiclets rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user space, user-space, users pace rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US init -> unit, int, nit rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup -> start up, start-up, upstart rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysfs -> sysops rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chipsets -> chip sets, chip-sets, Chiclets rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user space, user-space, users pace rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US init -> unit, int, nit rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup -> start up, start-up, upstart rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysfs -> sysops rasdaemon.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib (In reply to Mauro Carvalho Chehab from comment #3) > It follows the "rpmlint" output for *.rpm *.src.rpm *.spec: > > $ rpmlint misc/rasdaemon.spec `rpm --eval > %{_topdir}`/SRPMS/rasdaemon-0.3.0*.src.rpm `rpm --eval > %{_topdir}`/RPMS/*/rasdaemon-0.3.0*.rpm > rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chipsets -> chip > sets, chip-sets, Chiclets > rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user > space, user-space, users pace > rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US init -> unit, int, nit > rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup -> start up, > start-up, upstart > rasdaemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysfs -> sysops > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chipsets -> chip > sets, chip-sets, Chiclets > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user > space, user-space, users pace > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US init -> unit, int, > nit > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US startup -> start > up, start-up, upstart > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysfs -> sysops All the above are bogus, on my opinion, as the above are common words used on Linux ecosystem. > rasdaemon.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is also bogus, as the only files installed under /lib are the systemd ones: /usr/lib/systemd/system/ras-mc-ctl.service /usr/lib/systemd/system/rasdaemon.service And are installed with this syntax: %files ... %{_unitdir}/*.service (In reply to Aristeu Rozanski from comment #2) > Mauro, that url for the spec is a HTML file and fedora-review can't handle > it. Sorry for the mess. > I think you'll have to close this one and open a new one. Thanks, I'll do it, adding there the version 0.3.0 of this package. (In reply to Mauro Carvalho Chehab from comment #5) > (In reply to Aristeu Rozanski from comment #2) > > Mauro, that url for the spec is a HTML file and fedora-review can't handle > > it. > > Sorry for the mess. > > > I think you'll have to close this one and open a new one. > > Thanks, I'll do it, adding there the version 0.3.0 of this package. Recreated as BZ#965344. It seems that fedora-review is now working there: $ fedora-review -b 965344 INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 965344 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 965344 INFO: --> SRPM url: http://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/rasdaemon-0.3.0-1.fc18.src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: http://mchehab.fedorapeople.org/rasdaemon.spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/mchehab/965344-rasdaemon ERROR: chroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-17-x86_64/root/ not initialized! INFO: Re-initializing mock build root (this seems to take a very long time, but it looks that it is working) So, I'm closing this BZ, in favor of the newest one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 965344 *** |