Bug 961159

Summary: [RFE] No defined separation between environments that are not along the same promotion part
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component: ProvisioningAssignee: Katello Bug Bin <katello-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: NightlyCC: bkearney, mmccune
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-03-18 18:02:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Corey Welton 2013-05-09 01:30:53 UTC
Description of problem:

This is sort of a small detail, but it is polish.

If a user has environments across multiple promotion paths defined in katello and then attempts to create a system, there is no delineation separating the separate paths.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. In katello, ACME_Corporation, create environment "hello" with a prior environment of "Library"
2. Create environment "goodbye", with a prior environment of "hello"
3. Create an environment "buongiorno" with a prior prior environment of "Library"
4. Create an environment "mi scusi" with a prior environment of "buongiorno"
5. Observe in the katello UI that these are, indeed, two separate promotion paths.
6. Go to foreman Hosts > New Host; attempt to select an Environment ID from the dropdown; view results
  
Actual results:
There is no delineation or separation of the two promotional paths.

Expected results:
A line or something which indicates the environments are for separate paths. 

Additional info:

Comment 5 Mike McCune 2014-03-18 18:02:39 UTC
not critical

Comment 6 Mike McCune 2014-03-18 18:02:57 UTC
cwelton agreed with above closing