Bug 961429
| Summary: | A collection can get twice-enabled | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Libor Miksik <lmiksik> |
| Component: | scl-utils | Assignee: | Jan Zeleny <jzeleny> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Lukáš Zachar <lzachar> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | abienven, bgollahe, drieden, jzeleny, pm-eus |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | scl-utils-20120927-2.el6_4.5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
* When starting an inspection of what collections are already enabled, a wrong variable was taken as a source of this information. In a specific case, when users ran a shell in an scl_enabled environment, and tried to enable an already-enabled collection, then the collection was enabled twice. This could have caused problems if the enable scriptlets were not prepared for something like this, and might have destroyed some parts of the original environment. This update accepts the correct variable as a source of information about the already-enabled collections, and the collections are no longer enabled multiple times.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-07-16 09:53:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 955669 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Libor Miksik
2013-05-09 15:16:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1065.html |