Bug 964187

Summary: tuned-adm man: virtual-guest and virtual-host profile are not documented
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Component: tunedAssignee: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Branislav Blaškovič <bblaskov>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5CC: azelinka, bblaskov, jeder, jskarvad, yruseva
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Documentation, ManPageChange
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: There were no documentation for the virtual-guest and virtual-host profiles. Consequence: User was not able to get information about these profiles. Fix: The description for these profiles were added to the tuned-adm manual page. Result: The profiles are documented.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 986147 996985 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 11:35:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 996985    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed fix none

Description Jaroslav Škarvada 2013-05-17 12:55:09 UTC 
Description of problem:
tuned-adm man: virtual-guest and virtual-host profile are not documented

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tuned-0.2.19-12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. man tuned-adm
  
Actual results:
No documentation for virtual-guest and virtual-host profiles

Expected results:
Documentation for virtual-guest and virtual-host profiles
Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2013-05-17 12:58:36 UTC 
Created attachment 749349 [details]
Proposed fix
Comment 4 Branislav Blaškovič 2013-09-25 13:00:38 UTC 
I've done new TestCase which checks all profiles if they are mentioned in man pages. I think it should be enough to verify this bug and catch regressions in future.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 11:35:15 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1623.html