Bug 964414

Summary: eclipse: Felix Gogo shell is gone
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk>
Component: eclipseAssignee: Krzysztof Daniel <kdaniel>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: akurtako, andjrobins, jerboaa, kdaniel, mbenitez, overholt, rgrunber, swagiaal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-07-22 07:01:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-05-18 10:24:51 UTC
Description of problem:
In Fedora 18 Eclipse had CLI option -console which opened Apache Felix Gogo shell in terminal. The shell was useful to debug OSGi problems.

In Fedora 19 the Felix Gogo shell doesn't appear after passing -console option to eclipse. I don't know if this change is intentional or not, but the console was important feature for me.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
eclipse-platform-4.3.0-0.48.git4bccf2.fc19.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run eclipse -console
  
Actual results:
No Apache Felix Gogo appears

Expected results:
Apache Felix Gogo console shows up in terminal

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2013-05-20 06:16:29 UTC
Hmm, it starts fine for me. Can you try running with -clean to see whether there any resolving issues? Or as a last resort mv ~/.eclipse ~/.eclipse.old to see whether it helps?

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-07-20 21:35:40 UTC
The shell is back with current Fedora 19 + updates-testing.

Comment 3 Krzysztof Daniel 2013-07-22 07:01:05 UTC
Those bugs are caused by deps being out of sync. Rebuilds usually help. Closing as worksfor me per comment 2.