Bug 965500

Summary:	mach package should be built with PIE flags
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Dhiru Kholia <dkholia>
Component:	mach	Assignee:	Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	22	CC:	bressers, dhiru, dkholia, thomas
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-06-03 06:12:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dhiru Kholia 2013-05-21 10:11:39 UTC

Description of problem:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE says that "you MUST
enable the PIE compiler flags if your package has suid binaries...".

However, currently mach is not being built with PIE flags. This is a
clear violation of the packaging guidelines.

This issue (in its wider scope) is being discussed at,

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1104

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-March/180827.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

mach-1.0.2-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:

You can use following programs to check if a package is hardened:

http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/rpm-chksec

OR

https://github.com/kholia/checksec

Steps to Reproduce:

Get scanner.py from https://github.com/kholia/checksec

$ ./scanner.py mach-1.0.2-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm
mach,mach-1.0.2-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm,/usr/sbin/mach-helper,mode=0104750,NX=Enabled,CANARY=Disabled,RELRO=Partial,PIE=Disabled,RPATH=Disabled,RUNPATH=Disabled,FORTIFY=NA,CATEGORY=None

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2015-01-09 18:10:29 UTC

This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora 
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is 
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no 
longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will
be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 14:56:48 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2015-07-05 18:11:26 UTC

builds now with hardended flags, please re-check

Comment 5 Dhiru Kholia 2016-06-03 06:12:32 UTC

This is fixed now, hence I am clearing the NEEDINFO flag and closing the bug.