Bug 965955

Summary:	Add note on building from sources
Product:	[Retired] JBoss BRMS Platform 6	Reporter:	Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi>
Component:	Build and Assembly	Assignee:	Julian Coleman <jcoleman>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	unspecified	CC:	etirelli, kpiwko, rzhang
Target Milestone:	ER5
Target Release:	6.0.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	965601	Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-08-06 20:20:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	965601
Bug Blocks:

Description Lukáš Petrovický 2013-05-22 07:27:28 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #965601 +++

Despite the fact we distribute source distributions, those cannot be compiled without access to internal repositories (e.g. MEAD repository).

We need to propagate that information visibly to our customers, likely in following form in documentation and/or sources distributions zips in a readme file:   

   On request, Red Hat shall provide customers of [PRODUCT NAME] with
   sufficient access to certain contents of our internal Maven
   repository to facilitate rebuilding of original or modified
   versions of components of [PRODUCT NAME]. Such access will be
   provided by Red Hat to the requesting customer without undue delay.

Comment 3 Julian Coleman 2013-10-30 15:12:07 UTC

As part of the GA, we will provide:

  1) product binaries
  2) maven repository containing product maven artifacts and source/patch zips
  3) example maven settings file
  4) example mave POM

With 2) to 4), it should be possible to re-build product components, as well as to build applications against the product.

Comment 4 Ryan Zhang 2013-12-04 10:45:55 UTC

It seems no action is needed for this case.
Please verify it.

Comment 5 Lukáš Petrovický 2013-12-17 09:21:30 UTC

I can see no possible QE action for this one.