Bug 967485
Summary: | Review Request: nf3d - GANTT-style visualization for Netfilter connections and logged packets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dougsland, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | dougsland:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | nf3d-0.8-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-09-23 00:27:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christopher Meng
2013-05-27 09:26:01 UTC
Christopher, For this package please look this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires Can you please also check the following rpmlint output: nf3d.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/nf3d.conf http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#non-conffile-in-etc nf3d.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/infos.py Can you please notify upstream developers? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address nf3d.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/__init__.py 0644L /usr/bin/env nf3d.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/connobj.py 0644L /usr/bin/env http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks nf3d.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nf3d http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Man_pages Can you please open a ticket/bugzilla to upstream just for the record? Thanks! Thanks for figuring out the issues, I'll fix them ASAP. NEW: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/nf3d.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/nf3d-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review Rpmlint ------- Checking: nf3d-0.8-1.fc18.noarch.rpm nf3d.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nf3d 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. There is no man page, if possible work with upstream to provide man-page. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nf3d nf3d.noarch: W: no-documentation nf3d.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/infos.py nf3d.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/nf3d.conf nf3d.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/__init__.py 0644L /usr/bin/env nf3d.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/__init__.py nf3d.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/bin/nf3d nf3d.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/connobj.py 0644L /usr/bin/env nf3d.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nf3d/connobj.py nf3d.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nf3d 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. Please work with upstream to solve the above issues (FSF address and python sources with shebang) [OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 26c9d9128879b0b97df5c5bd3efebd99ad4acfba8a84ae25931821b6a3fab409 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 26c9d9128879b0b97df5c5bd3efebd99ad4acfba8a84ae25931821b6a3fab409 [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Python ============= [OK]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [OK]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Should ========= [OK]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [OK]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [OK]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK]: Buildroot is not present [OK]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [OK]: Dist tag is present. [OK]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [OK]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [OK]: SourceX is a working URL. [OK]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Status: APPROVED. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nf3d Short Description: GANTT-style visualization for Netfilter connections and logged packets Owners: cicku Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). nf3d-0.8-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nf3d-0.8-1.fc19 nf3d-0.8-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nf3d-0.8-1.fc20 nf3d-0.8-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nf3d-0.8-1.el6 nf3d-0.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. nf3d-0.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. nf3d-0.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. nf3d-0.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nf3d New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku Git done (by process-git-requests). |