Bug 967659
Summary: | Review Request: robojournal - cross-platform journal/diary tool | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Will Kraft <pwizard> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugs.michael, echevemaster, msuchy, pwizard |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | AwaitingSubmitter | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-07-21 13:56:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Will Kraft
2013-05-27 20:56:02 UTC
This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. Hi Will See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor Please put in the "Blocks" field, the tag FE-NEEDSPONSOR I have successfully built RPMS of the main executable and its documentation with Koji: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2715/5452715/robojournal-0.4.1-1.fc18.i686.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2714/5452714/robojournal-0.4.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3158/5453158/robojournal-doc-0.4.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm Once again, I am seeking a sponsor for this package. * Try to do a self-review of your package with the help of the following page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers ] [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers ] * Run "rpmlint -I" on all packages, the src.rpm *and* the built rpms. Apply fixes for obvious errors/warnings, ignore false positives, preferably comment on what rpmlint reports. * A brief look at the spec file: > Summary: Free journal software for everyone Summary: Cross-platform journal/diary tool would do a better job at summing up what the package offers. > BuildRequires: qt, qt-assistant, qt-mysql, qt-devel, qt-webkit, > qt-webkit-devel, patch 1) "patch" is available in the minimum build environment already and need not be specified as BuildRequires: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 2) Double-check the others for redundancies. At least "qt" and "qt-webkit" will be available as dependencies of qt-devel and qt-webkit-devel already. > # Apply standard Fedora patch so the app compiles properly > patch Makefile < fedora_build.patch Hmmm, this is fragile. First of all, it would be more normal to apply patches in %prep (after %setup) via %patchX and to add them as PatchX tags in the spec file. But since the patch file is included in the tarball, applying it manually is acceptable. Secondly, applying a patch manually in %build like it is done here breaks --short-circuit -bc rpmbuilds. So, apply patches in %prep. > Requires: qt, qt-assistant, qt-mysql, qt-webkit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make > strip robojournal Don't strip any files yourself. That breaks generation of -debuginfo packages. rpmlint will notice that, too. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Debuginfo_packages > #install files manually because "make install" doesn't work > with rpmbuild in this case. _What_ "doesn't work"? > %post > mandb -p To be deleted. Packages don't do that. > %clean > make distclean To be deleted. "make distclean" is also not what %clean is used for. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean > %{_datadir}/applications/robojournal.desktop You need to _use_ desktop-file-utils inside the spec file when packaging .desktop files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files > %{_datadir}/menu/robojournal The directory /usr/share/menu doesn't exist yet in Fedora filesystem packages, and this package doesn't include it either. What is it used for? Isn't it specific to Debian based systems? $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/menu luckybackup-0:0.4.7-3.fc19.x86_64 > %{_mandir}/man7/robojournal.7.gz %{_mandir}/man7/robojournal.7* would be cleaner, since it allows for a changed/customised/dropped compression technique. *** Bug 1009703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Closing due long inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you want to continue. |