Bug 967689 (tsung)
| Summary: | Review Request: tsung - A distributed multi-protocol load testing tool | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | lemenkov, mail, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lemenkov:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | tsung-1.5.0-3.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-09 23:49:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 563471 | ||
|
Description
Christopher Meng
2013-05-28 04:03:32 UTC
I'll review it (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #1) > I'll review it So? Any results? (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #1) > I'll review it Hi(I just can express hi). Hello again, Christopher. Here I am again with my
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
* First of all please add "%global debug_package %{nil}" to the top of the package. This is a typical Erlang shortcoming - an arch-independent data is installed into arch-dependent directory, so you can't mark it as noarch but must disable bogus debuginfo subpackage generation. We (me with my fellow colleague from SUSE community) are working on it.
* Please don't try to own the entire %{_libdir}/erlang/lib directory. Claim %{_libdir}/erlang/lib/* instead.
There are few mire Erlang-related issues but I don't want to consider them as a blockers. Instead I'll try to address/fix them in the meantime.
+/- rpmlint is not silent:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/tsung-1.5.0-1.fc20.ppc.rpm ../SRPMS/tsung-1.5.0-1.fc20.src.rpm | grep -v incorrect-fsf-address
tsung.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti
tsung.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US behaviour -> behavior
tsung.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gnuplot -> gnu plot, gnu-plot, plotting
^^^ False positives.
tsung.ppc: E: no-binary
tsung.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ that's normal for Erlang-related packages (as I explained above due to known shortcomings we have to install noarch data into arch-dependent directory).
tsung.ppc: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tsung/CONTRIBUTORS
^^^ Should be fixed, mostly cosmetic.
tsung.ppc: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/tsung-recorder.1.gz 1: warning: macro `\"' not defined
^^^ Not sure about the severity of this issue but I'd like to see it fixed as well.
tsung.ppc: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/tsung/tsung_plotter/tsung.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
^^^ Explain what's the purpose of this file or just drop shebang.
tsung.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tsung/examples/jabber_privacy.xml
^^^ Should be fixed (easy to fix).
tsung.ppc: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/tsplot.1.gz 1: warning: macro `\"' not defined
^^^ See above. I'd like to see it fixed/explained.
tsung.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tsung/examples/amqp.xml
^^^ Should be fixed (easy to fix).
tsung.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti
tsung.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US behaviour -> behavior
tsung.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gnuplot -> gnu plot, gnu-plot, plotting
^^^ False positives.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 131 errors, 12 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (strict GPLv2).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum tsung-1.5.0.tar.gz*
9af5c1cc5bc064f85c11cbfdff42f4a36fdea53c51a30354d75f553c8c6ee83f tsung-1.5.0.tar.gz
9af5c1cc5bc064f85c11cbfdff42f4a36fdea53c51a30354d75f553c8c6ee83f tsung-1.5.0.tar.gz.1
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
-/+ The package does bundles copies of system libraries but as I said I'd like to import package as is and deal with these unwanted addons later.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
0 No header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
- The package owns files or directories already owned by other packages (see my note regarding %{_libdir}/erlang/lib above)
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Ok, please address/explain issues mentioned by me and I'll continue.
All fixed. Spec URL: http://cicku.me/tsung.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm Feedback sent to upstream. :) (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm 404 (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #6) > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > > > SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm > > 404 Internet connection was disturbed, please try again now. Thanks. (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #7) > (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #6) > > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > > > > > SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/tsung-1.5.0-2.fc20.src.rpm > > > > 404 > > Internet connection was disturbed, please try again now. > > Thanks. OK, I've just downloaded it. I dont see any significant issues so I declare this package as APPROVED. ps Chrostopher could you please add me to InitialCC list? I'd like to keep an eye on all Erlang packages. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: tsung Short Description: A distributed multi-protocol load testing tool Owners: cicku Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: peter Git done (by process-git-requests). tsung-1.5.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tsung-1.5.0-3.fc18 tsung-1.5.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tsung-1.5.0-3.fc19 tsung-1.5.0-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tsung-1.5.0-3.el6 Package tsung-1.5.0-3.el6: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing tsung-1.5.0-3.el6' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11397/tsung-1.5.0-3.el6 then log in and leave karma (feedback). tsung-1.5.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. tsung-1.5.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. tsung-1.5.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tsung InitialCC: erlang-sig Done. |