Bug 967742

Summary:	Unable to create alert definition with Drift condition type
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	Libor Zoubek <lzoubek>
Component:	REST	Assignee:	Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.8	CC:	theute
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	RHQ 4.8
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-09-11 09:53:56 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Libor Zoubek 2013-05-28 08:21:06 UTC

Description of problem: I a not able to create alert condition of 'Drift' type. Issue is very similar to Bug 967488


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8-master

How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:
do POST /alert/definition/?resourceId=xxx

with t{"dampeningCategory": "NONE", "conditions": [{"category": "DRIFT", "name": "drift.*", "option": ".*"}], "conditionMode": "ALL", "enabled": true, "name": "rest-condition-drift-detection"}his body


Actual results:
Can not construct instance of org.rhq.core.domain.alert.AlertConditionOperator from String value 'drift.*': value not one of declared Enum instance names\n at [Source: org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteInputStream@46cb0d63; line: 1, column: 66] (through reference chain: org.rhq.enterprise.server.rest.domain.AlertDefinitionRest[\"conditions\"]->org.rhq.enterprise.server.rest.domain.AlertConditionRest[\"name\"]

Expected results:

alert definition is created. When creating a definition of type "DRIFT", "name" should be interpreted as "drift definition name" regular expression, do match drift definition, and "option" is a regular expression to match pathname.


Additional info:

Comment 1 Heiko W. Rupp 2013-06-04 19:10:08 UTC

master e718326

Comment 2 Heiko W. Rupp 2013-09-11 09:53:56 UTC

Bulk closing of old issues now that HRQ 4.9 is in front of the door.

If you think the issue has not been solved, then please open a new bug and mention this one in the description.