Bug 968278

Summary: License should be MIT or Ruby or BSD
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Component: rubygem-mochaAssignee: Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: bkabrda, mastahnke, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vondruch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rubygem-mocha-1.1.0-1.fc21 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-07 15:46:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vít Ondruch 2013-05-29 11:15:01 UTC 
The README says:

> You may use, copy and redistribute this library under the same terms as Ruby
> itself or under the MIT license.

Therefore the license should be fixed to

> MIT or Ruby or BSD

Actually upstrema should be queried about the BSD, since the Ruby license changed from GPLv2+ or Ruby to BSD or Ruby.
Comment 1 Fedora End Of Life 2013-09-16 14:02:30 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle.
Changing version to '20'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20
Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2014-07-07 15:46:21 UTC 
https://github.com/freerange/mocha/issues/201