Bug 968585

Summary: [abrt] libreoffice-core-3.6.6.2-5.fc18: SvxShape::HasSdrObjectOwnership: Process /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ian Pilcher <ipilcher>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, ipilcher, ltinkl, mstahl, sbergman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:6e5fb55f4bd6bd9755918a3b9973b4113d932a25
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-31 05:39:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:14:50 UTC 
Description of problem:
Attempting to move object (grouped bitmap, shape, text) in Impress.

Version-Release number of selected component:
libreoffice-core-3.6.6.2-5.fc18

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.4
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin --impress /tmp/OpenShift_Enterprise_Sales_Presentation-11APR2013-2.odp --splash-pipe=6
crash_function: SvxShape::HasSdrObjectOwnership
executable:     /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin
kernel:         3.9.4-200.rhbz806091.fc18.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
uid:            1000
xsession_errors: 

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 SvxShape::HasSdrObjectOwnership at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/svx/source/unodraw/unoshape.cxx:281
 #1 SdrObject::Free at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/svx/source/svdraw/svdobj.cxx:518
 #2 SdrUndoObjList::~SdrUndoObjList at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/svx/source/svdraw/svdundo.cxx:748
 #3 ~SdrUndoRemoveObj at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/solver/unxlngx6.pro/inc/svx/svdundo.hxx:300
 #4 ~SdrUndoDelObj at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/solver/unxlngx6.pro/inc/svx/svdundo.hxx:337
 #5 ~UndoDeleteObject at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/sd/inc/undo/undoobjects.hxx:77
 #6 sd::UndoDeleteObject::~UndoDeleteObject at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/sd/inc/undo/undoobjects.hxx:77
 #7 SfxUndoArray::~SfxUndoArray at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/svl/source/undo/undo.cxx:1494
 #8 ~SfxListUndoAction at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/solver/unxlngx6.pro/inc/svl/undo.hxx:159
 #9 SfxListUndoAction::~SfxListUndoAction at /usr/src/debug/libreoffice-3.6.6.2/solver/unxlngx6.pro/inc/svl/undo.hxx:159
Comment 1 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:14:54 UTC 
Created attachment 754567 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:14:57 UTC 
Created attachment 754568 [details]
File: cgroup
Comment 3 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:01 UTC 
Created attachment 754569 [details]
File: core_backtrace
Comment 4 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:05 UTC 
Created attachment 754570 [details]
File: dso_list
Comment 5 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:08 UTC 
Created attachment 754571 [details]
File: environ
Comment 6 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:11 UTC 
Created attachment 754572 [details]
File: limits
Comment 7 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:15 UTC 
Created attachment 754573 [details]
File: maps
Comment 8 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:18 UTC 
Created attachment 754574 [details]
File: open_fds
Comment 9 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:21 UTC 
Created attachment 754575 [details]
File: proc_pid_status
Comment 10 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-29 22:15:24 UTC 
Created attachment 754576 [details]
File: var_log_messages
Comment 11 David Tardon 2013-05-30 08:01:38 UTC 
Is it reproducible?
Comment 12 Ian Pilcher 2013-05-30 13:17:53 UTC 
(In reply to David Tardon from comment #11)
> Is it reproducible?

I haven't seen it again.
Comment 13 David Tardon 2013-05-31 05:39:55 UTC 
Too bad :-(