Bug 968846

Summary: [Webadmin] RFE - Add "Last Page" Button in "Virtual Machines" Tab
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: David Botzer <dbotzer>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portalAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.2.0CC: acathrow, bazulay, ecohen, emesika, iheim, jkt, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: infra
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-27 08:36:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
LastPage none

Description David Botzer 2013-05-30 06:07:06 UTC
Created attachment 754668 [details]
LastPage

Description of problem:
in "Virtual Machines" Tab, Add "Last Page" Button 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.2/sf17.3

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install rhevm
2.create many VMs
3.Select "Virtual Machines" Tab

Actual results:
The user has to press next for each page in order to get to the last page

Expected results:
Should have a button Last Page (>>)

Additional info:
Pic

Comment 1 Eli Mesika 2013-05-30 09:28:46 UTC
This is a general request since all tabs rely on the search mechanism.

Last page is complicated, since in order to know to get to the last page we must get the count of entity instances on the specific search creteria whicj might be time consuming.

If you want to look in the last page, you can do it today by switching the "sortby" direction on the specific key from desc to asc and vice versa 

Since search queries are executed often and when the engine have lo of users connected concurrently we will get lots of serach queries executed at the same time. I suggest not to implement this, rhater, suggest the sortby as a workaround

Comment 3 Itamar Heim 2013-11-27 08:36:49 UTC
closing as not trivial. will reconsider if there is a high demand