Bug 971132

Summary: Hadoop JobTracker GUI (port 50030) job counters have incorrect values
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Diane Feddema <dfeddema>
Component: gluster-hadoopAssignee: Bradley Childs <bchilds>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Martin Kudlej <mkudlej>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: mainlineCC: aavati, eboyd, matt, mkudlej, rhs-bugs, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-03-03 16:31:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1057253    

Description Diane Feddema 2013-06-05 18:52:39 UTC
Description of problem:
Hadoop JobTracker GUI (port 50030) is reporting incorrect job counter values for some counters.  Some examples include:

"SPLIT_RAW_BYTES" is a negative number (this is a count and should be a positive integer)

"Bytes Read" is zero for jobs that are reading data. 

"Rack-local map tasks" is reported however, Hadoop-glusterfs does not have rack awareness. 

"Data-local map tasks" is not reported

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Run a mapreduce job

2.open a web brower port 50030 for node running your jobtracker
for example:
http://gprfs001.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com:50030/

3. under "Completed Jobs" click on a jobid and view the job counters for that job.

Actual results:
Incorrect hadoop job counter values displayed in JobTracker GUI

Expected results:
Correct hadoop job counter values displayed in JobTracker GUI



Additional info:

Comment 2 Steve Watt 2013-08-22 19:16:33 UTC
This is a counters issue. We should have full counter support with the new plugin rearchitecture. I suspect, this is no longer an issue.

Comment 3 Bradley Childs 2013-08-29 14:44:43 UTC
Fixed in latest redesign using the (Raw)LocalFileSystem.