Bug 973058
| Summary: | shellinabox ssl support need devel package on el6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Sven Sternberger <sven.sternberger> |
| Component: | shellinabox | Assignee: | Simone Caronni <negativo17> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | negativo17 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-06-12 20:10:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sven Sternberger
2013-06-11 07:55:21 UTC
Hello, # rpm -q openssl-devel package openssl-devel is not installed # ls -alghs /usr/lib64/libssl.so* 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root 15 Apr 13 19:48 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.0 376K -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root 375K Mar 4 23:22 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 # rpm -q shellinabox shellinabox-2.14-22.git88822c1.el6.x86_64 # ldd /usr/sbin/shellinaboxd linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff7f53c000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x0000003ab7a00000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003ab7200000) libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x0000003ab8a00000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003ab6e00000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003ab6a00000) # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.4 (Final) # ps -e| grep shell 26101 ? 00:00:00 shellinaboxd 26102 ? 00:00:00 shellinaboxd shellinaboxd is not linked to libssl.so, it does not use OpenSSL at all and as such does not have a requirement or build requirement on OpenSSL. On Fedora the requirements/libraries used are the same. Nope, sorry, it is hardcoded in the source: $ grep -R libssl.so * debian/changelog: * Added support for runtime naming of the libssl so library. libhttp/ssl.c: // libraries. As libssl.so can depend on libcrypto.so, we try to load libhttp/ssl.c: // it, iff we haven't tried loading it before and iff libssl.so does not libhttp/ssl.c: // soname of libssl for systems where it is not libssl.so. libhttp/ssl.c: path_libssl = "libssl.so"; (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2) > Nope, sorry, it is hardcoded in the source: > so strace gives me: strace -f -e open shellinaboxd -u shellinabox -g shellinabox --cert=/var/lib/shellinabox --port=4200 2>&1 |grep ssl open("/usr/lib64/libssl.so", O_RDONLY) = 4 open("/usr/lib64/libssl.so", O_RDONLY) = 4 shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc18 shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc19 shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5 shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el6 shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc17 Package shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-10415/shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Tested the rpm on my boxes (SL6.4/64bit), looks good. Thank you for your quick response. shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. shellinabox-2.14-24.git88822c1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |