Bug 97369
Summary: | allow clearpart --drives=hda,sda --initlabel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Marc MERLIN <marc_soft> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-08-06 21:25:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marc MERLIN
2003-06-13 18:41:11 UTC
Additionally, it'd be great if --ondrive would take a drive number, as in --ondrive=1 that way, I don't have to hardcode hda or sda and worry about the installer maybe installing on the second drive Defining what is the "first" drive gets me three answers from talking with three different people. This is exactly why we added the %include syntax was so that people could get exactly what they wanted. Ok. But "first drive" isn't that hard to figure out, especially when the system only has IDE or SCSI. If it has both, no need to be too fancy and guess what the bios is going to boot, just default to hda That's still ways better than nothing, or a custom include script I guess a syntax similar to grub's (hd0,0) for first partition of the first drive whether it's IDE or SCSI would have been more convenient for the kickstart config file If a system only has IDE or SCSI, then it's easy to make the kickstart config correct also. Things are only ever complicated in environments where they get mixed and when you start throwing things like cciss into the fray. Grub's syntax doesn't help, it has the exact same problems (which is why there is a way to reorder drives on the advanced boot loader screen). Again, this is *exactly* the scenario that %include exists for, so that you can use the criteria that makes the most sense to you. |