Bug 97373

Summary: System UPTIME reported incorrectly
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael McLagan <mmclagan>
Component: kernelAssignee: Dave Jones <davej>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1CC: degeneracypressure, pfrields, sundaram, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-28 19:01:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Michael McLagan 2003-06-13 20:00:23 UTC
Description of problem:
/usr/bin/uptime does not properly handle large numbers.  How can someone
promote and publicize a high uptime when reporting utility is incorrect?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
procps-2.0.11-6

How reproducible:
ALWAYS

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot Linux system
2. Go away for 497 days
3. check uptime
    
Actual results:
[root@utility OLD]# uptime
 15:59:01  up 23 days, 23:08,  6 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.13, 0.09


Expected results:
[root@utility OLD]# uptime
 15:59:01  up 520 days, 23:08,  6 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.13, 0.09


Additional info:
05/19/03  00:00:00  up 495 days,  9:32,  4 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.06, 0.06
05/20/03  00:00:00  up 496 days,  9:32,  4 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.11, 0.09
05/21/03  00:00:00  up  7:05,  4 users,  load average: 1.14, 1.17, 1.17
05/22/03  00:00:00  up 1 day,  7:05,  4 users,  load average: 1.19, 1.29, 1.27
05/23/03  00:00:01  up 2 days,  7:05,  4 users,  load average: 1.13, 1.25, 1.27

[root@utility OLD]# cat /proc/uptime
2070689.03 41047961.72

Comment 1 Alexander Larsson 2003-07-10 09:50:15 UTC
This is a kernel problem. Uptime is basically jiffies, and at 100 Hz it wraps in
497 days

Comment 2 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:41:08 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/


Comment 3 Rahul Sundaram 2005-11-23 23:01:00 UTC
Looks like this fell off the cracks and has not been fixed yet.

http://www.linux-noob.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=1780

Comment 4 Dave Jones 2005-11-28 19:01:20 UTC
that report is against fc1 which was 2.4 based.
all 2.6 kernels have this fixed.