Bug 977206

Summary: quota: default soft-limit is 80%
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Saurabh <saujain>
Component: glusterdAssignee: vpshastry <vshastry>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Saurabh <saujain>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: amarts, kdhananj, mzywusko, nsathyan, rhs-bugs, sdharane, vbellur, vshastry
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta1-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-23 22:39:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Saurabh 2013-06-24 04:49:17 UTC
Description of problem:
the default as coveyed to should be 90% and it is still 80%

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@quota1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glusterfs
glusterfs-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
[root@quota1 ~]# gluster volume quota dist-rep list
                  Path                   Hard-limit Soft-limit   Used  Available
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/                                          100GB       80%      0Bytes 100.0GB

Comment 2 Amar Tumballi 2013-07-03 12:52:34 UTC
Now its 90%.

Comment 4 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:39:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html

Comment 5 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:43:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html