Bug 979447

Summary:	Clarify EWS support table in WFK 2.3 release notes draft
Product:	[Retired] JBoss Enterprise WFK Platform 2	Reporter:	mark yarborough <myarboro>
Component:	doc-Release-Notes	Assignee:	Petr Penicka <ppenicka>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Tomas Repel <trepel>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	2.3.0	CC:	bsutter, maschmid, mnovotny, pmuir
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	2.3.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-07-16 11:33:02 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description mark yarborough 2013-06-28 15:01:52 UTC

Document URL: 

Section Number and Name: 

Describe the issue: 

Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information: 

In the draft wfk 2.3 release notes section 3.5 as of 18-jun:

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html-single/2.3.0_Release_Notes/index.html#ews_compatibility

^^^ the section is called "EWS compat" yet the list
shows what is NOT compatible, which is counter-intuitive
and Burr Sutter reqeusted this bug to correct it.

As reference, the format used in WFK 2.2 is pretty clear:

https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.2/html-single/2.2.0_Release_Notes/index.html#idm4102752

Thanks

Comment 1 Petr Penicka 2013-07-02 12:03:45 UTC

Modifying the section to list only incompatible frameworks was intentional. Instead of listing all frameworks (and creating duplicity with the tier lists above), I wanted to simplify and put it the way that "all but the following" are compatible with EWS.

I agree though that it was counterintuitive due to the title. How about changing the title to "Frameworks Incompatible with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server":

Burr, Mark: Does that work for you? If not, I can still change it to be as it was previously.

Docs stage URL: https://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html/2.3.0_Release_Notes/ews_compatibility.html

Comment 2 Marek Schmidt 2013-07-09 13:19:08 UTC

I believe the original version was more useful for an EWS customer, wanting a concise list of what is actually supported on EWS.

Comment 3 Petr Penicka 2013-07-09 14:19:49 UTC

Ok, I restored the original list (and updated it with newly added frameworks).

Docs stage URL: https://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html/2.3.0_Release_Notes/ews_compatibility.html

Quick check URL: http://file.brq.redhat.com/ppenicka/WFK23_RN_draft/