Bug 980977
| Summary: | [RHS-RHOS] If storage becomes unavailable volume actions fail (error_deleting) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Ben Turner <bturner> |
| Component: | openstack-cinder | Assignee: | Sergey Gotliv <sgotliv> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Dafna Ron <dron> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.0 | CC: | bturner, eharney, grajaiya, jkt, sgotliv, vagarwal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.0 (RHEL 7) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | storage | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: |
virt rhos cinder integration
|
|
| Last Closed: | 2014-05-29 15:40:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ben Turner
2013-07-03 17:50:31 UTC
I believe "cinder force-delete" will allow you to remove the volume rather than manipulating the database. (In reply to Eric Harney from comment #1) > I believe "cinder force-delete" will allow you to remove the volume rather > than manipulating the database. Eric, regardless of a workaround of using force-delete, in the least the error message is incorrect. In addition, what happens if the user issues delete again? would that work? |