Bug 981653

Summary:	quota: crash in glusterd after list command fails
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Saurabh <saujain>
Component:	glusterd	Assignee:	Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Saurabh <saujain>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.1	CC:	amarts, kparthas, mzywusko, rabhat, rhs-bugs, sdharane, sgowda, vbellur, vshastry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta4_1	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-09-23 22:39:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	983544
Bug Blocks:

Description Saurabh 2013-07-05 12:16:28 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@quota1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glusterfs
glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.12rhs.beta2-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.4.0.12rhs.beta2-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-debuginfo-3.4.0.12rhs.beta2-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta2-1.el6rhs.x86_64
[root@quota1 ~]# 


How reproducible:
executed the test first time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a volume, start it
2. enable quota, set some limit
3. mount the volume over nfs.
4. create 500 directories and inside these 500 directories, create one more sub-dir in each dir.
5. set limit on each dir and subdir as 2GB and 1GB each.
6. gluster volume quota <vol-name> list

Actual results:
step 6, the quota command fails
gluster volume status 
fails as glusterd is not operational

on a keener look, there is a crash.


Expected results:

list command should succeed for whatever be the number of directories and in this it is just 500 directories + 500 subdirs

Additional info:

Comment 3 Krutika Dhananjay 2013-07-08 16:07:05 UTC

https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/9875/ <--- Posted for review in downstream

Comment 5 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:39:54 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html

Comment 6 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:43:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html