Bug 983392

Summary:	grammar error in "volume sync" command
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	spandura
Component:	glusterd	Assignee:	Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:	storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.1	CC:	rhs-bugs, vbellur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	glusterd
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-12-03 17:15:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description spandura 2013-07-11 06:40:58 UTC

Description of problem:
=======================

Currently the "volume sync" command is syntax: 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
volume sync <HOSTNAME> [all|<VOLNAME>] - sync the volume information from a peer

This means, volume sync <HOSTNAME> can be used with 2 options "all" and "VOLNAME".

Expected behavior:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. volume sync <HOSTNAME> should be used with 2 options either "all" or "VOLNAME". Hence the options can't be inside square braces []. 

2. As per the discussion with developer, "all" option is not working. Either we should be removing this "all" option from the command or document about not to use "all" option. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
=============================================================
root@king [Jul-11-2013-12:09:42] >gluster --version
glusterfs 3.4.0.12rhs.beta3 built on Jul  6 2013 14:35:18

root@king [Jul-11-2013-12:10:02] >rpm -qa | grep glusterfs-server
glusterfs-server-3.4.0.12rhs.beta3-1.el6rhs.x86_64

Comment 2 spandura 2013-07-11 09:23:40 UTC

Expected Behavior:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3. Currently , the volume sync command has to be executed on the node which requires sync. 

General understand about any volume command is that, the volume commands can be executed from any of the storage node in the cluster. But this command has to be specifically executed on the node which requires volume information to be synced. 

This is quiet confusing.

Comment 3 spandura 2013-07-11 11:34:34 UTC

The "Expected Behavior 2" mentioned in description of the problem doesn't hold good as the option "all" is working. 

Tested this option i.e "gluster volume sync <node> all" as part of testing the bug "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865700". This is working fine now. 

Verified on build:
===================
root@king [Jul-11-2013-17:03:11] >gluster --version
glusterfs 3.4.0.12rhs.beta3 built on Jul  6 2013 14:35:18


root@king [Jul-11-2013-17:03:16] >rpm -qa | grep glusterfs-server
glusterfs-server-3.4.0.12rhs.beta3-1.el6rhs.x86_64

Comment 4 Vivek Agarwal 2015-12-03 17:15:35 UTC

Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Gluster Storage. The release for which you requested us to review, is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs/

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Red Hat Gluster Storage, please feel free to file a new report against the current release.