Bug 983608 (gpaw)
Summary: | Review Request: gpaw - A density-functional theory code based on the PAW method | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | i, Marcin.Dulak, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-04-22 11:52:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 983614, 1090070 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Susi Lehtola
2013-07-11 14:35:30 UTC
Hi, Please remove python_sitearch define, BuildRoot tag, rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install section, whole %clean section and %defattr(-,root,root,-) from your spec. As SRPM needs all BRs to build main and sub pkgs, no matter how many subpackages are existed, please move all BuildRequires in subpackages, like: BuildRequires: python2-devel BuildRequires: numpy BuildRequires: python-ase BuildRequires: atlas-devel BuildRequires: hdf5-devel BuildRequires: libxc-devel BuildRequires: scalapack-openmpi-devel BuildRequires: blacs-openmpi-devel BuildRequires: hdf5-openmpi-devel BuildRequires: openmpi-devel BuildRequires: scalapack-mpich2-devel BuildRequires: blacs-mpich2-devel BuildRequires: hdf5-mpich2-devel BuildRequires: mpich2-devel (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > Hi, > > Please remove python_sitearch define, BuildRoot tag, rm -rf %{buildroot} in > %install section, whole %clean section and %defattr(-,root,root,-) from your > spec. Although these are defaulted on current versions of Fedora, having them doesn't hurt and is in fact necessary to be able to build on EPEL. > As SRPM needs all BRs to build main and sub pkgs, no matter how many > subpackages are existed, please move all BuildRequires in subpackages, like: Non sequitur. The SRPM will get all the BRs from the subpackages. The separate BRs for the subpackages are because the BRs are only for those subpackages. If there is yet another MPI runtime, it will get its own subpackage and own buildrequires. Would you like to use daily snapshot for instance: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/gpaw-0.9.1.10814.tar.gz as source0? And can you check the patchs if they've been merged into upstream? (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Would you like to use daily snapshot for instance: > > https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/gpaw-0.9.1.10814.tar.gz > > as source0? No, because the daily snapshots vanish from the mirror (and possibly also can change checksums). > And can you check the patchs if they've been merged into upstream? This is not really relevant for anything, these are Fedora specific patches. Besides, had they been merged, applying the patches to a newer snapshot will fail. *** Bug 1087812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi Susi, are you still willing to maintain GPAW? You find a complete up-to-date spec i created without being aware of your review request. Note the %check section that runs a subset of gpaw-test and that some tests need to be disabled (problems known in the gpaw trunk or old scalapck/numpy issues). (In reply to marcindulak from comment #6) > Hi Susi, > > are you still willing to maintain GPAW? > You find a complete up-to-date spec i created without being aware of your > review request. Note the %check section that runs a subset of gpaw-test and > that some tests need to be disabled (problems known in the gpaw trunk or old > scalapck/numpy issues). Actually, I think it's probably better to let someone else handle this, as I don't use gpaw myself and am pretty much always busy with other stuff! So please, go ahead. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1087812 *** |