Bug 984471
Summary: | Dist-geo-rep : geo-rep with change_detector xsync or first xsync crawl , fails to sync few of the regular files to the slave. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Vijaykumar Koppad <vkoppad> |
Component: | geo-replication | Assignee: | Venky Shankar <vshankar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vijaykumar Koppad <vkoppad> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | aavati, amarts, bbandari, csaba, racpatel, rhs-bugs, sdharane, shaines, vbhat |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | TestBlocker |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta6-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-09-23 22:29:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vijaykumar Koppad
2013-07-15 10:28:58 UTC
xsync crawl would get the list of the files that were created and would try to create them on the slave (it does not know if it's a hardlink). This file would have a gfid already existing on the slave with a different parent-gfid/bname. Could you check if the entries are present in the XSYNC-CHANGELOG.<timestamp> file? Venky, The missing files have entries in XSYNC-CHANGELOG.<timestamp>. I was checking it wrongly earlier. This is not the case with hard links. It happens with the regular file creation too. Stop geo-rep, create some 1000 regular files, and start geo-rep. It fails to sync all the files to slave. verified on 3.4.0.14rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html |