Bug 985563
| Summary: | Logging, conf.d and log rotation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Trever Adams <trever> | ||||||
| Component: | prosody | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | mcepl, mcepl, redhat-bugzilla | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | prosody-0.9.8-1.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-04-20 18:37:21 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Trever Adams
2013-07-17 18:52:47 UTC
Created attachment 774927 [details]
Configuration patch
Created attachment 774928 [details]
Logrotate script
/var/log/prosody/prosody.log /var/log/prosody/prosody.err {
(In reply to Trever Adams from comment #0) > * I would like to see a conf.d/*.cfg.lua setup like Ubuntu/Debian do so that > virtual hosts can be added easily. I like the rest, but this one seems like over-complication of the stuff. RHEL/Fedora was always based on the assumption that sysadmin should be able to manage his $EDITOR. I would like the second and third point of initial description, I have less opinion on the first point (given that Prosody is IMHO not same virtual host friendly as e.g. httpd - especially when remembering to my employers prosody configuration; think of mod_proxy65 as stupid example). Not all of the modules can be modified per host, granted. However, having the conf.d directory does make it much easier to manage with things like puppet. I can go either way, as in reality most of my setups will be completely managed with puppet and I have it setting up that. This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. What is the situatino here? This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 prosody-0.9.8-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.fc22 prosody-0.9.8-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.fc21 prosody-0.9.8-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.fc20 prosody-0.9.8-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.el6 prosody-0.9.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. prosody-0.9.8-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.el7 prosody-0.9.8-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. prosody-0.9.8-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. prosody-0.9.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.9.8-1.el5 prosody-0.9.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. prosody-0.9.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. prosody-0.9.8-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |