Bug 985811
Summary: | java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.7 is FTBFS on ARM on all releases | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Component: | java-1.7.0-openjdk | Assignee: | jiri vanek <jvanek> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ahughes, chphilli, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek, omajid |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | arm | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-08-07 15:30:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 245418 |
Description
Peter Robinson
2013-07-18 09:54:20 UTC
This is known issue. However it is not possible to solve this by simple patch. This will be fixed by updating arm part of jdk from 2.1 to 2.3 (or 2.4). Luckily this raised in time when this update i possible. Just note - this still need some time. afaik Chris is already very close to allow the update. (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #1) > This is known issue. However it is not possible to solve this by simple > patch. It would be nice if this was communicated rather than left until we find it. It happens just about every time there's a java update and having to chase becomes tiring. With ARM being approved to move to the primary architecture build systems moving forward this will affect every build of java Hi Peter Sorry for problems [due to backports from 2.3 of security fixes], but what we are doing is making the versions the same rather than having to backport security patches etc to 2.1 for arm, it will now get the same hotspot as other arch's. [2.3 now soon 2.4] We intend for this to be the case from now on though atm there are still issues in 2.4 arm asm32 jit integration. Chris PS Jiri I'm unsure what further info is needed, 2.3 is now at least as good as the former 2.1 wrt arm 32 asm and is better as it has the current set of security fixes. PPS I'd still like to reproduce/fix the 2.1 failure but I am not familiar enough to locate the source bundle. Can someone point me to both a source bundle and a machine that it fails on... (I am able to build 2.1 and run it on arm but its from the repo. This may either be different from whats being built in the source rpm or the failure may again be machine specific) Chris: any update on the 2.3 build? |