Bug 985812
Summary: | quota + remove-brick: remove brick fails to start | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Saurabh <saujain> |
Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Kaushal <kaushal> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Saurabh <saujain> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | grajaiya, kaushal, kdhananj, kparthas, mzywusko, rhs-bugs, shmohan, vagarwal, vbellur, vshastry |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0.34rhs | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-27 15:29:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Saurabh
2013-07-18 10:01:38 UTC
This is not in anyway related to quota. There was a problem with starting remove-brick around the time the packages used were built. This caused all remove-brick start commands to fail. There was a bug filed for this (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982184) which was fixed, and the fix has been available since glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta6-1. The original bug has been verified, and has been closed with ERRATA. Moving this to ON_QA for verification, with fixed in version as glusterfs-3.4.0.33rhs. Verified on 3.4.0.34rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64 Shanks, Since this bug was a side effect of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982184, I am not adding errata doc text to this bug. Does that make sense? Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1769.html |