Bug 986863

Summary:	Review Request: ntopng - High-Speed Web-based Traffic Analysis and Flow Collection
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Christopher Meng <i>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	i, package-review, pahan, ravnzon, shawn.starr
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	NotReady
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-07-11 00:46:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Christopher Meng 2013-07-22 09:30:11 UTC

Spec URL: http://cicku.me/ntopng.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/ntopng-1.0-1.src.rpm
Description: ntopng is the next generation version of the original ntop, a network traffic probe that shows the network usage, similar to what the popular top Unix command does. ntop is based on libpcap and it has been written in a portable way in order to virtually run on every Unix platform, MacOSX and on Win32 as well.

ntopng users can use a a web browser to navigate through ntop (that acts as a web server) traffic information and get a dump of the network status. In the latter case, ntop can be seen as a simple RMON-like agent with an embedded web interface. The use of:

- A web interface.
- Limited configuration and administration via the web interface.
- Reduced CPU and memory usage (they vary according to network size and traffic).
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

Comment 1 Palle Ravn 2013-07-31 20:42:16 UTC

For both the spec file and the rpm, I get a "Oops! That page can’t be found." Correct the links and I will have a go at it.

Comment 2 Account closed by the user 2013-11-06 22:11:01 UTC

ping!

Comment 3 Christopher Meng 2013-11-07 07:14:22 UTC

Ah...Hi Xose and Palle...

I'm perturbed to reply here as I'm not sure if this package should be submitted by ntop maintainers...So I removed the URLs from my server...

Comment 4 Account closed by the user 2013-11-22 14:49:31 UTC

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3)

> I'm perturbed to reply here as I'm not sure if this package should be
> submitted by ntop maintainers...So I removed the URLs from my server...

Add Marcelo, ntop maintainer.

Comment 5 Pavel Alexeev 2014-04-25 12:52:02 UTC

Do you interesting continue? Post working file URLs.

Comment 6 Shawn Starr 2015-03-12 22:11:06 UTC

Any reason no movement on this?

Comment 7 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:48:27 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 8 Package Review 2020-07-11 00:46:49 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.