Bug 98852
Summary: | CAN-2003-0192: mod_ssl renegotiation issue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | dave, mblevis, mitr, mjc |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0192 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-09-04 07:40:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joe Orton
2003-07-09 15:46:20 UTC
*** Bug 101784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This bug was opened on July 9 to address a security issue and it remains a "NEW" status issue. When can we expect movement on this so that Redhat users and RHN subscribers aren't being encouraged to use outdated and insecure software packages? I guess it should really be "assigned" since we did start through our internal errata process which will lead to an errata. This issue is classed as a low priority however as the SSL renegotiation options were for a long time considered experimental and are rarely used. An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-240.html |