Bug 988991
| Summary: | Update gmock to 1.6.0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko> |
| Component: | gmock | Assignee: | Timothy St. Clair <tstclair> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | besser82, i, ignatenko, matt, terje.rosten, tstclair |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-07-02 06:17:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Igor Gnatenko
2013-07-26 20:49:40 UTC
I've requested acls to update both gmock and gtest. Also, there is a symbol collision when working with the versions of gmock and gtest that are in the repo in the cases where both are included. Hi guys, let's try to find a solution, hoewever please consider: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737268 first. Re: the comments about 'make install' https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/googletestframework/Zo7_HOv1MJ0 I'm not certain how we should handle *this. Just ignore? Ok, after reading the threads it looks like this will become a source only package, and any downstream packages that depend on it will have to rebuild with their flags (non-ideal), but doable. Might want to discuss this on -devel? push on master 1c16ad1..a507f0a master -> master upgrades to 1.6.0 and has a 1st cut patch to setup an install. It still requires a review of how we will deal with /src/ install, and it's missing the scripts too. I've updated latest spec and patches in the fedora repos: a507f0a..8798e6d master -> master But I have not yet spun through koji. I'm hoping others can take a look and try to determine what dependency breakage (if any) could ensure. updated our install.patch and submitted an upstream issue: https://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/detail?id=163 built, we may inadvertently break some dependent packages on *this. May we get this to F19 as well? This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20 |