Bug 989043

Summary:	rubygem-nokogiri 1.6.0 is available
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer>
Component:	rubygem-nokogiri	Assignee:	Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mtasaka, mtasaka, tremble, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-12-30 07:12:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	989400
Bug Blocks:

Description Ken Dreyer 2013-07-27 04:23:06 UTC

Latest upstream release: 1.6.0 (on 2013-06-08)
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.5.9
URL: https://rubygems.org/gems/nokogiri

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2013-07-29 10:04:33 UTC

Mamoru, do we really need mini_portile for nokogiri? I doubt so. According to [1], you should set NOKOGIRI_USE_SYSTEM_LIBRARIES env variable and then a system libxml2 is used, therefore no mini_portile is needed.

Although it probably propagates into .gemspec file and it is listed among runtime dependencies, I consider this bug and that should be clarified with upstream.

Or did I missed something?



[1] https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/blob/master/ext/nokogiri/extconf.rb#L87

Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2013-08-13 11:55:54 UTC

Mamoru, could you comment, please?

Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-13 15:15:03 UTC

I want to make mini_portile passed rather than playing with metadata.

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2013-08-13 15:51:39 UTC

I am not suggesting playing with metadata, but resolving this bug with upstream: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/956

Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-08-13 16:01:12 UTC

So anyway making mini_portile passed is appreciated.

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2013-08-29 12:02:43 UTC

Seems that RubyGems upstream will consider "buildtime" dependencies. Mamoru, would you mind to do some remark in the nokogiri's .spec file, that the R: rubygem(mini_portile) might be removed in the future and link there the RubyGems as well as nokogiri's upstream issues? Thanks.

Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2013-12-30 07:12:26 UTC

Well,

- F-21 is now 1.6.1
- F-20 is now 1.6.0, 1.6.1 is in testing
- Runtime dependency for mini_portile is killed.

Closing for this old bug.