Bug 990721

Summary: UPDATING PACKAGE OPENJDK TO JAVA-1.7.0-OPENJDK-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.FC19.X86_64 BREAKS ALL THE ALTERNATIVES IN /ETC/ALTERNATIVES
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rubén <rlledo>
Component: java-1.7.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: ahughes, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek, omajid
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-01 13:32:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Alternatives
none
System log none

Description Rubén 2013-07-31 20:43:55 UTC
Created attachment 781356 [details]
Alternatives

Description of problem:
ALL ALTERNATIVES IN /ETC/ALTERNATIVES ARE BROKEN. NO APPLICATION USING JVM WORKS.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64

How reproducible:
Simply typing in terminal "sudo yum upgrade"

Actual results:
ALL ALTERNATIVES IN /ETC/ALTERNATIVES ARE BROKEN. NO APPLICATION USING JVM WORKS.

Expected results:
package java-1.7.0-openjdk updated.

Additional info:
I actually don't know if this is a bug. Yesterday, 2013-07-30, all applications using JVM worked seamless. But today, 2013-07-31, after a rutinary check for system upgrades, I did "sudo yum upgrade", which upgraded openjdk, among other packages. Next, I ran azureus and to my surprise it didn't work. Reinstallation doesn't solve the problem. Screeshots tells the rest of the story.

Comment 1 Rubén 2013-07-31 20:44:31 UTC
Created attachment 781357 [details]
System log

Comment 2 Deepak Bhole 2013-07-31 20:47:06 UTC
Can you please paste the output of 'alternatives --display java'?

Comment 3 Rubén 2013-07-31 21:07:43 UTC
(In reply to Deepak Bhole from comment #2)
> Can you please paste the output of 'alternatives --display java'?

java - el estado es automático. [translation: automatic state]
el enlace apunta actualmente a /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java [translation: link currently points to ...]
/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java - prioridad 170025
 esclavo keytool: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/keytool [esclavo means "slave"]
 esclavo orbd: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/orbd
 esclavo pack200: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/pack200
 esclavo rmid: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/rmid
 esclavo rmiregistry: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/rmiregistry
 esclavo servertool: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/servertool
 esclavo tnameserv: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/tnameserv
 esclavo unpack200: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/unpack200
 esclavo jre_exports: /usr/lib/jvm-exports/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64
 esclavo jre: /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64
 esclavo java.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/java-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo keytool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/keytool-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo orbd.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/orbd-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo pack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/pack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo rmid.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmid-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo rmiregistry.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmiregistry-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo servertool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/servertool-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo tnameserv.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/tnameserv-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
 esclavo unpack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/unpack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk.1.gz
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/java - prioridad 170025
 esclavo keytool: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/keytool
 esclavo orbd: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/orbd
 esclavo pack200: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/pack200
 esclavo rmid: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/rmid
 esclavo rmiregistry: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/rmiregistry
 esclavo servertool: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/servertool
 esclavo tnameserv: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/tnameserv
 esclavo unpack200: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre/bin/unpack200
 esclavo jre_exports: /usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre
 esclavo jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64/jre
 esclavo java.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/java-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo keytool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/keytool-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo orbd.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/orbd-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo pack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/pack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo rmid.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmid-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo rmiregistry.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/rmiregistry-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo servertool.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/servertool-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo tnameserv.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/tnameserv-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
 esclavo unpack200.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/unpack200-java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.10.fc19.x86_64.1.gz
La 'mejor' versión actual es /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java. [translation: best current version is ...]

Needless to say is that "/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java" doesn't exists.

Comment 4 Deepak Bhole 2013-07-31 21:10:11 UTC
Can you try updating to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=438484? It fixes a range of alternatives issues.

Comment 5 Rubén 2013-07-31 21:32:51 UTC
Solved! Thank you very much!

Comment 6 Deepak Bhole 2013-08-01 13:32:15 UTC
No problem!