Bug 991280

Summary: Review Request: regina-rexx - Regina Rexx Interpreter
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christopher Meng <i>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: dan, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:47:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Christopher Meng 2013-08-02 04:42:17 UTC
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/regina-rexx.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/regina-rexx-3.7-1.fc20.src.rpm 

Description: Regina is a interpreter of Rexx, which is a programming language that was 
designed to be easy to use for inexperienced programmers yet powerful enough 
for experienced users. It is also a language ideally suited as a macro 
language for other applications. 

For more information on Rexx, visit http://www.rexxla.org
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

Comment 1 Mario Blättermann 2013-08-25 15:57:16 UTC
I had a look at some packages provided by RPMsphere [1]. The only package which needs it is "the" (The Hessling Editor). Referring to the dependencies, it doesn't need the binaries from regina, just the libraries. So it would make sense to move the shared libs to a subpackage. If someone wants to package the "the" then he can let it depend on regina-rexx-libs only.

$ rpmlint -i -v *
...
regina-rexx.src:21: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 21)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic
annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.


%package        doc
Summary:        Documentation files for %{summary}
Requires:	%{name} = %{version}-%{release}

A -doc subpackage doesn't have to depend on the base package in any case. It doesn't need the base package for viewing, so this dep could be dropped. Maybe someone wants to read the docs only before installation...?


We have a mix of licenses:

$ licensecheck -r *
alloca.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
apphead.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
arxfuncs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
builtin.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
client.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
cmath.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
cmsfuncs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
common/rxpack.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
common/rxpack.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
common/rxdef.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
configur.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
contrib/fnmatch.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
contrib/time64.c: UNKNOWN
contrib/checker.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
contrib/fnmatch.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
contrib/time64.h: UNKNOWN
convert.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
dbgfuncs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
debug.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
defs.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
envir.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
epoc32/recrexx/RexxFileRecognizer.h: UNKNOWN
epoc32/recrexx/RexxFileRecognizer.cpp: UNKNOWN
epoc32/epoc32.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
epoc32/epoc32.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
error.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE
execiser.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
expr.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
extern.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
extstack.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
extstack.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
files.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
funcs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_convert.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_tree.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE
gci/gci_prepare.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_reginabridge.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_rxfuncdefine.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_helper.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_call.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/gci_execute.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
gci/embedded.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
getopt.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
instore.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
interp.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
interprt.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
lexsrc.c: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE
library.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
mac.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mac.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
macros.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
memory.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
misc.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
msgcmp.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_notmt.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_notmt.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_os2.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_os2.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_posix.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_posix.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_win32.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_win32.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_win64.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
mt_win64.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
nosaa.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
ntservice/service.c: UNKNOWN
ntservice/service.h: UNKNOWN
options.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os2/rexx.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os2/rexxapi.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os2funcs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os_os2.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os_other.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os_unx.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
os_win.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
parsing.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
regina64.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
regina.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
regina_c.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
regina_t.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
regutil/regscreen.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regutil.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/inifile.h: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regtrig.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regstem.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regcrypt.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regsem.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regini.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regmacrospace.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/inifile.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/rxproto.h: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regscreenux.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regsemos2.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regscreenos2.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regunicode.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/rxsupport.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regfilesys.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/random.c: BSD (4 clause)
regutil/regsemux.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regwin.c: MPL (v1.0)
regutil/regutil.h: MPL (v1.0)
rexxbif.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
rexxbif.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rexx.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rexxext.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rexx.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rexxmsg.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) GENERATED FILE
rexxsaa.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rexxsaa.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rxiface.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rxqueue.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
rxstack.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
shell.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
signals.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
stack.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
staticld.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
strings.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
strings.h: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
strmath.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
test1.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
test2.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
threader.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
tracing.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
trip/true.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
trip/rc.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
trip/std.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
unxfuncs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
utsname.h: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
variable.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
vmscmd.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
vmsfuncs.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
vms.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
wrappers.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)
wrappers.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
yaccsrc.c: GPL (v3 or later)
yaccsrc.h: GPL (v3 or later)

The regutil files are MPL licensed, most of the other ones LGPL. That's why the license tag actually has to be "LGPLv2+ and MPLv1.0". I'm not sure how to handle the single GPL licensed file, but COPYING-LIB contains the LGPL anyway. 
 
Have a look at the files yaccsrc.*. I was wondering if it is a bundled library, the bison and yacc packages from Fedora don't contain anything similar.

The BUGS file should be part of %doc in the base package. 

[1] http://pkgs.org/fedora-19/rpm-sphere-i586/regina-3.7-4.1.i686.rpm.html
[2] http://pkgs.org/fedora-19/rpm-sphere-i586/the-3.3RC1-401.1.i686.rpm.html

Comment 2 Dan Horák 2013-08-25 16:20:38 UTC
please see http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/regina-rexx.html where I've spent some time making regina-rexx Fedora-compliant

Comment 3 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:48:33 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 4 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:47:37 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.