Bug 993662
| Summary: | adobe-source-libraries possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> |
| Component: | adobe-source-libraries | Assignee: | Alec Leamas <leamas.alec> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | leamas.alec |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-01-18 20:38:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 993551 | ||
adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc19 This change affects F-20 only. Why ship it as an update to F-19? I suggest deleting the update in comment 1. I have used the way recommended in [1] to keep the spec file identical in f19-f20, easing further maintenance. Is this a problem? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs No. But the question is: why are you shipping an F-19 update that does not change anything for them, it just makes them download and install it for absolutely no benefit? You can keep the specfile identical and even commit it to the f19 branch in git if you want, but there's no need to actually ship the F-19 update. (by "them" I meant F-19 users) "Banging my head to the table" Of course, I could commit it without making an update. It's just that silly me so far always have been making an update after committing. You're right, I 'll drop this update. Package adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14534/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-19.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #6) > You're right, I 'll drop this update. Doesn't look it was deleted/cancelled yet as it already made it to updates-testing. Please take care of it -- I'd already done it myself but unfortunately bodhi won't let me. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20 |
adobe-source-libraries was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not foolproof, it is basically this grep: grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes, the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc should no longer contain the package version. More information and tips: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973