Bug 993681

Summary: bcfg2 possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: bcfg2Assignee: Fabian Affolter <mail>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: john, mail
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-09 21:34:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 993551    

Description Ville Skyttä 2013-08-06 11:38:32 UTC
bcfg2 was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention
due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not
foolproof, it is basically this grep:

    grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec

Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A
good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for
your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes,
the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc
should no longer contain the package version.

More information and tips:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973

Comment 1 John Morris 2013-08-06 13:33:01 UTC
Hi Ville,

Yes, I have confirmed this bug.  It is fixed in a reworked specfile I'm proposing to both upstream (who bundles a version) and Fedora maintainers.  See

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.bcfg2.devel/4669/focus=4673

and

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978448