Bug 993869

Summary: man firewalld.richlanguage
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Petr Sklenar <psklenar>
Component: firewalldAssignee: Thomas Woerner <twoerner>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Tomas Dolezal <todoleza>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: jpopelka, todoleza, twoerner
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 12:47:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 980210    

Description Petr Sklenar 2013-08-06 12:42:50 UTC
Description of problem:
see steps

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firewalld-0.3.4-1.fc19.noarch

How reproducible:
rfe

Steps to Reproduce:
man firewalld.richlanguage
there are some missing stuff:
 Which options should be used?
  * There is not mentioned options like --add-rich-rule/--remove-rich-rule/--list
  * examples could contain not only rule itself but full command line.


Actual results:
not mentioned any cmd line options

Expected results:
There is list of command line options: --*-rich-rules
There are examples with full command line options

Additional info:

Comment 3 Jiri Popelka 2013-08-26 15:13:16 UTC
(In reply to Petr Sklenar from comment #0)
> Expected results:
> There is list of command line options: --*-rich-rules
> There are examples with full command line options

firewalld.richlanguage(5) describes the format of rich language rules generally.
This format is used not only by firewall-cmd but also in D-Bus interface, therefore it's been separated into this man page.

I've added a note into the examples section:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/commit/?id=ca7067cdb7644d0457c9c42d47e66920310e1e34

Comment 7 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 12:47:26 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.