Bug 993991
| Summary: | nautilus-python possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> | ||||
| Component: | nautilus-python | Assignee: | Patrick Dignan <dignan.patrick> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | dignan.patrick, opensource, oskar.berggren, surkum | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-02-15 06:57:13 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 993551 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20 The problem seems to be a configure option in the SPEC file. Created attachment 839286 [details]
Working spec file
Tested on fc20.x86_64
This bug prevents building the package on Fedora 20 (FTBFS in bug #992325). Fedora 20 will therefore install the binary package from fedora 19, which doesn't work (see bug #1046899). So currently no python based nautilus extensions will work in Fedora 20. nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20 Package nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2032/nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). The "%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/examples/*.py" line in this update's specfile is redundant (but harmless), the special %doc used on the line above already ends up owning everything in %{_pkgdocdir}.
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #7) > The "%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/examples/*.py" line in this update's specfile is > redundant (but harmless), the special %doc used on the line above already > ends up owning everything in %{_pkgdocdir}. Just to make sure I understand it correctly: The line %doc README AUTHORS COPYING NEWS does not only copy the specified files to %{_pkgdocdir} but also matches everything already present in %{_pkgdocdir}? Nowadays yes: http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=blob;f=build/files.c#l1674 Before rpm 4.9.1 special %doc cleared the doc dir before it copied files into it: http://rpm.org/ticket/836 nautilus-python-1.1-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
nautilus-python was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not foolproof, it is basically this grep: grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes, the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc should no longer contain the package version. More information and tips: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973