Bug 994236
Summary: | cpucycles.o and randombytes.o missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frederik Holden <frh+fedora> |
Component: | nacl | Assignee: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 19 | CC: | jskarvad, me |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | nacl-20110221-8.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-10-23 06:22:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Frederik Holden
2013-08-06 20:05:41 UTC
Thanks for the report. It makes sense to me, I am fixing it in f19 - f20. I noticed the debian maintainer already notified the upstream, so I am not forwarding it again. nacl-20110221-7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nacl-20110221-7.fc19 Package nacl-20110221-7.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nacl-20110221-7.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14468/nacl-20110221-7.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Is libnacl.a really the right place for cpucycles.o and randombytes.o ? I'm not sure because the "Files" section on this site ( http://petio.org/tools/nacl.html ) shows that libnacl.a, cpucycles.o and randombytes.o are placed together in the library dir. I have also seen some projects which are looking for the two .o files in the library dir instead of using libnacl.a. Only wanted to note that, maybe you are right. (In reply to JannikV from comment #4) Thanks for info. For me it seems strange to have there archive and two separate objects which are also deps for objects in the archive. But I am watching the debian bug and waiting for the upstream reply - no problem to change it. (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #5) > (In reply to JannikV from comment #4) By reading the upstream reply I suppose they prefer the objects to be outside of the archive. I am changing it this way. Package nacl-20110221-8.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nacl-20110221-8.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14468/nacl-20110221-8.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). nacl-20110221-8.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |